[NTLUG:Discuss] RedHat 6.3

Dennis Myhand dmyhand at ednaisd.org
Fri Mar 5 13:43:01 CST 2004


I had a lot of trouble with a network config bug.  I filed a bug report on
it at bugzilla.  RedHat 8.0 and it's network hangups inspired my more or
less permanent move to Debian and Debian based distros.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George Lass" <George.Lass at osc.com>
To: "NTLUG Discussion List" <discuss at ntlug.org>
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] RedHat 6.3


> "Cameron, Thomas" wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: George Lass [mailto:George.Lass at osc.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 4:53 PM
> > > To: ntlug
> > > Subject: [NTLUG:Discuss] RedHat 6.3
> > >
> > >
> > > Please don't ask why, but does anyone have a
> > > *complete* set of RedHat 6.3 Installation CD's?
> > >
> > > OK, I'll tell you why.....  We have some
> > > vendor software that we need to upgrade, and
> > > RedHat 6.3 is what they support. I guess its
> > > got to be better than the *really* old stuff
> > > we are currently using that only runs on RedHat 5.2....
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > George
> > >
> > > --
> > > "We Can't solve problems by using the same kind
> > > of thinking we used when we created them."
> > >
> > > Albert Einstein
> >
> > No such animal as 6.3.  Maybe you meant 7.3?
> >
> > ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/redhat/linux/6.2/en/iso/i386
> >
> > or maybe
> >
> > ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/redhat/redhat/linux/7.3/en/iso/i386
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT
> > Assistant Vice President
> > Linux Design and Engineering
> > Bank of America
> > (972) 997-9641
> >
> > The opinions expressed in this message are mine alone and do not
necessarily reflect the opinions of my employer, Bank of America.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > https://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
> Well the plot thickens.....  Our vendor has come up with a newer
> version API that will work under RedHat 8.0.  I seem to recall
> that there were some serious flaws in RH8, and rather than messing
> with 8.1, 8.2 etc they went straight to 9.  Does anyone else remember
> anything about RH8 (good or bad)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> George
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>




More information about the Discuss mailing list