[NTLUG:Discuss] FAT32 no longer supported FS???

[Gilbert Morrow]

what is CONFIG_FAT_FS set to?  Y or N
what is CONFIG_VFAT_FS set to?  Y or N
Shouldn't that be (=m)

On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 1:20 PM, ./aal <al_h at technologist.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Gilbert Morrow <gkfmorrow at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I have a 40gb drive from a old laptop that I bought a enclosure for and
> use
> > , never had a problem with it auto mounting FAT32 formatted file system
> in
> > SuSE .
> > What is the device ID ?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Stephen Davidson <
> > gorky at freenet.carleton.ca> wrote:
> >
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Greetings.
> >>
> >> Jan 31 11:33:28 sda64 kernel: FAT: "fat=32" option is obsolete, not
> >> supported now
> >>
>
>
>
> zgrep FAT /proc/config.gz
>
> what is CONFIG_FAT_FS set to?  Y or N
> what is CONFIG_VFAT_FS set to?  Y or N
>
>
> which kernel are you booting?  (uname -r)
>
> do your sources match? (ls -l /usr/src/linux)
>
>
> --
> I'm a PC(x86 AND ppc)
> AND I RUN LINUX!!!
> Linux is like ice cream. It comes in many flavors and everyone has
> their favorite, but we all get the same smile regardless of which we
> choose to scoop.
> Dan Quayle  - "[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>



-- 
"Look what I found !"