[NTLUG:Discuss] slow download -- use Fedora 7 as a router

Leroy Tennison leroy_tennison at prodigy.net
Tue Apr 15 23:42:20 CDT 2008


m m wrote:
> I wonder if it a good idea to use the Fedora 7 as a router.
> 
> What happened is When I upgrade my linux box from RH 7.0 (?) to Fedora 7,
> 
> use the same rules for iptables and make the configuration as I had before, and the speed is down to the terrible slow -- just like the dial up speed!
> 
> some factors I discovered:
> 
> 1. although I configured the eth0 use DHCP, when I reboot the server, a lot of time it is up ( it says OK while booting) and have no IP address (I use Time Wanner cable).
> 
> 2. I have to manually add route rules when I reboot --- route add -net default dev eth0
> 
> 
> 
> All connection are good, as I can access/ping all computers in intranet. Internet connection is ok EXCEPT very slow.
> 
> The ip_forward, rp_filter are all set to 1.
> 
> 
> 
> the internet connection (cable to my house) speed is normal.
> 
> I have tried to google for the solution, and no luck.
> 
> 
> some one here have any idea?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Use video conversation to talk face-to-face with Windows Live Messenger.
> http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_messenger_video_042008
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 

A couple of thoughts come to mind.  If you were on Red Hat 7 and went to 
Fedora 7, what's the hardware platform?  Red Hat 7 to Fedora 7 is a huge 
jump, if you didn't already have new (or at least recent) hardware that 
could be an issue.  I noticed a performance difference (not huge but 
noticeable) going from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5 on the same hardware.

The second thought concerns not getting a DHCP address.  Are both NICs 
DHCP?  The reason I ask is my home machine has two NICs (one DHCP and 
one not) and when I upgraded from Red Hat 9 to CentOS 4 the NICs 
"reversed themselves" (eth0 became eth1 and vice versa).  If I remember 
correctly I put the MAC address in the ifcfg-eth? files to force the NIC 
naming to be what I wanted.  Don't know how this would be related to 
speed but it might be worth checking if for no other reason than to 
insure that there isn't "network confusion" in the mix.



More information about the Discuss mailing list