[NTLUG:Discuss] Java/Linux versus school teacher.

Leroy Tennison leroy_tennison at prodigy.net
Mon Mar 19 23:05:28 CDT 2007


Robert Citek wrote:
> steve wrote:
>   
>> Do we have any Java/Linux guru's in the house?
>>
>> My son is learning Java in high school - inevitably they use
>> Windows machines - but it's Java - which is portable - so it
>> doesn't matter a whole lot.  So my kid can use Linux to do
>> his homework without problems.
>>
>> ...mostly...
>>     
>
> What implementation and version of Java are they using on Windows?  What
> version of Windows?  What implementation and version of Java are you
> using on Linux?  What distro and version of Linux?
>
> You may be right about the Java question.  But I'm trying to imagine the
> next few steps.  If you are right, how are you going to present your
> results to the teacher?  What course of action would you like the
> teacher to take?
>
> Regards,
> - Robert
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>   
Am I missing something here?  I thought the promise of Java was "write 
once, run anywhere".  Yea, I know - marketing.  But still, this stuff is 
supposed to work in the real world and it's beginning to sound like 
running Java has a lot in common with visiting Las Vegas.  What's also 
disturbing is to see comments indicating that similar things may exist 
in C++.  Have we made programming languages so complex that we have 
almost guaranteed ourselves of "shooting ourself in the foot"?

I have to admit, I haven't been a big object-oriented fan, mainly 
because I've seen it implemented in scripting languages such as VB and 
OpenOffice macros.  In my opinion we've lost sight of the purpose: 
scripting and macro "languages" were intended to be relatively easy 
allowing someone with lesser training to do useful automation and, in 
the process, get a "big bang for the buck".  It seems that the "high 
priests of object oriented programming" have succeeded in depriving most 
people of that possibility any more.



More information about the Discuss mailing list