[NTLUG:Discuss] Samba Server comments = performance hit
Chris Cox
cjcox at acm.org
Wed Feb 14 08:56:15 CST 2007
Kenneth Loafman wrote:
...
>
> If the frequency of checking was high, then this may be a very small
> hit, but I can't believe that it would amount to more than a few seconds
> a week at the most. I've had Samba servers up for days that just did
> not use up that much time overall, even under heavy use.
>
> This may have been a factor when CPU's were measured in MHz, but
> anything newer should not be affected at all.
According to John Terpstra... it's a huge hit. Just fyi. I think
he knows what he's talking about.
There's a reason why some distributions moved away from a highly
commented smb.conf file.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list