[NTLUG:Discuss] SELinux

[Terry Henderson]

On 5/28/06, Leroy Tennison <leroy_tennison at prodigy.net> wrote:
> Began reading Red Hat's SELinux documentation (RHEL 4) and it sounded
> like something only they were doing so I decided to Google for "SELinux"
> and "distribution".  Found a reference to "SELinux for SuSE is dead" and
> then a reference to AppArmor on the Novell Website.  Anyone used either
> and have an opinion?  Is SELinux really dead on SuSE?
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://ntlug.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>

According to Wikipedia, SELinux "is not a Linux distribution, but
rather a set of modifications that can be applied to Unix-like
operating systems, such as Linux and BSD"  From:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SELinux

I'm not sure what "SELinux for SuSE is dead" actually means, but you
can always find distro hawks that will run down other distributions
just to drive home the point that what THEY have is better - and I'm
guessing that's what this is about, (but I could be wrong..).

-- 
Registered Linux User 188099
                  <><