[NTLUG:Discuss] printing using CUPS
Leroy Tennison
leroy_tennison at prodigy.net
Mon Jul 18 04:24:02 CDT 2005
Charles Cashion wrote:
> I have an AMD computer running Fedora Core 3.
> It is connected via ethernet to a router.
> The router connects to a print server.
> The print server address is 192.168.1.254 and it responds to ping.
> The print server connects by parallel port to the Canon i550 inkjet.
> The router also connects to a cable modem supported by comcast.
>
> The router/print server/Canon i550 are all working.
>
> I have cups-1.1.22
>
> If you were sitting in front of my computer, and it did not print,
> what would you want to see? What would you want to examine?
>
> Thanks,
> Charles Cashion
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
Go into the print queue itself (System Settings->Printing) and see if
there are any messages in the Description area (I'm having trouble with
FC3 using settings which work fine on RH9). One issue you may be facing
is if the printer itself needs to "talk back" to the host. Idon't know
if CUPS can handle this (not trying to cast doubt, just don't know). If
nothing is in the queue then "windowize" your apps so that you can see
the queue and application simultaneously. Try to print watching to see
if it appears that anything is making it to the queue. If it is then
what I would want to see is an Etherreal trace. There are some
guidelines for setting this up if you have never done one: Get the
application set up to print first (all you have to do is click 'print'),
start Etherreal and start a capture, immediatly change to the
application and print, assoon as things are "quiet" (no obvious
activity) stop the capture. The goal is to get only 100-200 packets in
the trace (in most cases the less the better). In the trace you are
looking for high-level things: messages going to the print server's IP
address, any replies coming back, retries to the print server
(particularly with no response). This may give you some idea of where
the problem is located. Avoid getting into intra-packet analysis if at
all possible - you could be hours or days disecting them.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list