[NTLUG:Discuss] ubuntu anyone

Dennis Myhand dmyhand at ednaisd.org
Thu Apr 7 13:45:02 CDT 2005


The issues I ran into were that there was no media player which "simply
worked," and there did not seem to be a way to get any type of JRE
working in firefox.  I was never able to get around either of these
issues.  I don't know about which codecs they have, and it wasn't that
the player sucked, but codecs was not in the error messages I got.  It
simply did not work due to issues with which libs were, or were not,
installed.  Now, I do like Ubuntu, and I did try Hoary before I went
back to Libranet.  I hope they get thing more right than they have to
this point.  I will not say that I won't try Ubuntu again.  I just need
a system which has more working out of the box than Ubuntu has.

-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-bounces at ntlug.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at ntlug.org] On
Behalf Of Zac Brown
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 6:00 AM
To: NTLUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] ubuntu anyone


Correction, Ubuntu doesn't have _just_ GNOME, assuming you add the
Universe repository you gain access to numbers more of WM's and DE's. As
for the default media player, you're right, it sucks but the only reason
it doesn't work is they have no copyright infringing codecs installed.
There's a howto on the wiki about compiling and setting up mplayer with
win32codecs. I'm not sure what java/firefox issue you're speaking of but
I have never run into it nor have any of the other users I associate
with in the Ubuntu community. I've never had trouble compiling anything
either as far as needing libs goes. Sounds like you had a rough
time ;). 

On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 05:04 -0500, Dennis Myhand wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 16:49, Fred James wrote:
> > All
> > Any one have any experience with ubuntu Linux - any thoughts or
opinion 
> > to share?  Thank you in advance for any help you may be able to
offer.
> > Regards
> > Fred James
> 
> I used the stable and testing versions for about 8 months.  Installs
> easy, has a lot of great features with it, only has GNOME (Which I
> prefer to use), and has a lot of good ideas behind it.  Unfortunately,
a
> lot of the default programs do not work on Ubuntu.  I had hell getting
a
> media player to work (never did), and there was a serious problem with
> Java and firefox.  If the program you want to use is not in the Ubuntu
> lists (called Universe, but is actually far smaller than the known
> universe), and you try to manually install it, the libs may not be
there
> and you may break more stuff trying to install them than the system
can
> tolerate.  I really like Ubuntu, but a lot of work still needs to be
> done.  HTH, Dennis in Victoria
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> https://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 
-- 
Zac Brown <zbrown at physika.org>
Registered Linux User: 356244
Ubuntu Backports Developer <http://backports.ubuntuforums.org>

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.4 - Release Date: 4/6/2005
 
  

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.4 - Release Date: 4/6/2005
 






More information about the Discuss mailing list