[NTLUG:Discuss] no one has such problem? was: Is there a such 'low power stan

[Jared Cook]

m m,

If your whole machine isn't going into standby, your
nic won't on its own.  I just don't think that's what
your problem is.  Of course, I don't know what your
problem is.

jared
 
--- m m <llliiilll at hotmail.com> wrote:
> how about I install power management package, and
> set never idle?
> 
> 
> >From: "m m" <llliiilll at hotmail.com>
> >Reply-To: discuss at ntlug.org
> >To: jaredmcook at yahoo.com, discuss at ntlug.org
> >Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] Is there a such 'low
> power standby' 
> >phenomenons?
> >Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:33:24
> >
> >still have the problem, and something interesting
> is I cannot get the
> >webpage from my server but my friend can (at
> different location/state)!
> >please below, I have more detail information.
> >
> >help!?
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >>From: Jared Cook <jaredmcook at yahoo.com>
> >> > >From: Mark Bickel <eusmb at exu.ericsson.se>
> >
> >> > > > the server is kind of 'dead'.
> >> > > > but if I physically go back to 'use' the
> box
> >> >
> >> > I double checked:
> >> > There is no APM settings on the BIOS (disabled)
> >> > no amp modules was compiled in the kernel.
> >> > ampd is not rinning.
> >> >
> >> > still has this problem.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>I'm new here, but I'll be going to my first NTLUG
> >>meeting soon.
> >>
> >>Here's one from out in left field.  I had problems
> >>with ARP while using an LVS/IPVS cluster.  There
> are a
> >>lot of issues with virtual IPs and ARP addresses
> that
> >>I won't get into here, but the bottom line is I
> had to
> >>ping stuff in order to broadcast my ARP address
> >>because the router would add another MAC to it's
> table
> >>after a while.  {This might sound really strange,
> but
> >>in LVS, you have the members with the same virtual
> IP
> >>as the director, and if they are also responding
> to
> >>ARP requests your director is left out in the
> cold)
> >>I finally fixed it, but it was a nightmare trying
> to
> >>figure it out.
> >>
> >>My point is this, if you are on the other side of
> a
> >>router from the clients, your router may not have
> your
> >>ARP address for some odd reason.  Yes, it should
> be
> >>asking, but if another machine has the same IP, it
> >>could be responding to the ARP request first, or
> not
> >>responding at all for some reason.  This would
> explian
> >>why you had to telnet and ping arround for the
> others
> >>to get to you.
> >>
> >>So, in a nutshell, check to see if another machine
> has
> >>the same IP.
> >>
> >>Without more knowledge of your network topography
> it
> >>can be difficult to determine what the problem
> >>is.
> >
> >this is the topo of my network:
> >
> >internet
> >  |
> >(public ip from AT&T cable modem, forget the brand
> of NIC but use ne 
> >driver)
> >linux firewall
> >(private fixed ip 192.168.1.1, kingston PCI NIC)
> >  |
> >switch
> >| | |
> >| | |-fixed ip 192.168.1.2 (3com nic)
> >| |---fixed ip 192.168.1.3 (3com nic)
> >|-----fixed ip 192.168.1.4 (3com nic)
> >
> >all boxes were asigned fix ip except the public ip
> (were assigned by AT&T
> >cable)
> >
> >>From: "Paul Ingendorf" <pauldy at wantek.net>
> >>Reply-To: discuss at ntlug.org
> >
> >What kind of network are you on; DSL @HOME other
> cable provider using pppoe
> >dhcp static?  Also what flava are you using.   From
> your
> >previous posts I see possible @HOME with redhat 6.2
> running a 2.2.14 
> >kernel.
> >  I could be wrong but just to go out on a limb are
> you
> >using a etherpro driver on an intel 10/100 ethernet
> card?  If so there 
> >maybe
> >a problem reading the mac adress from the card with
> the
> >driver that came with that kernel.  This causes
> multiple machines with this
> >card to get the same Hardware ethernet address.  On
> DHCP
> >this can create some interesting lease problems
> where multiple machines on
> >the network are sharing the same ip.  Which goes
> back to
> >the suggestion by Jared.  There is also the
> possibility that your being
> >given a dhcp address that someone else has decided
> they want
> >as their static ip or vice versa.  So I wouldn't
> discount Jareds suggestion
> >based off the idea of your network being to simple.
> >
> >Yes, I am using @HOME, with redhat 6.2, but running
> 2.4.14 kernel.
> >The eth0 on the firewall is using ne driver (forget
> the brand name, cheap
> >one)
> >the eth1 on the firewall is using 8139too driver
> (realteck chip)
> >the rest of boxes use 3com 3c509 nic
> >
> >I am useing tinydns as dns server running on
> firewall.
> >
> >does not setup ARP (should I?)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>Jared Cook
> >>
> >>http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
> >Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:
> http://messenger.msn.com
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/