[NTLUG:Discuss] Re: FTP problem
Robert Fournerat
robert at netin.com
Thu Nov 1 20:53:25 CST 2001
Daniel,
Do you have the ip_masq_ftp module loaded (or whatever ftp module
that matches your kernel)?
-- Robert
Daniel L. Shipman wrote:
> I am facing problem with ftp.
>
>
>
> I have a static ip (216.61.196.129)
>
>
>
> My machines are using internal ip address. Server address 192.168.1.1
>
>
>
> The LRP routes FTP request to 216.61.196.129 to 192.168.1.1 running wu-ftpd.
>
>
>
> When most clients try to connect to my ftp server, they are able to
> establish the connection but not able to do 'ls' or 'get' or 'put'.
> They are able to do 'cd' and 'pwd'.
>
>
>
> When they say
> ftp>ls
>
>
>
> It says:
> 227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,1,1,115,233)
> ftp: connect: No route to host
>
>
>
> I am able to do traceroute to the ftp server from a client's machine.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Daniel
> Webmaster for:
> http://www.srj.net
> http://www.hometownhospital.com
> http://www.easyhealthcare.net
> http://www.ngpa.org
> http://www.cathedralofhope.com
> http://www.iusarentals.com
>
> <http://hc2.humanclick.com/hc/20922718/?cmd=repstate&site=20922718&imageUrl=http://www.srj.net/humanclick&ver=1>
> <http://hc2.humanclick.com/hc/20922718/?cmd=file&file=visitorWantsToChat&site=20922718&byhref=1>
>
>
>
> *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** Privileged/Confidential Information may
> be contained in this message and/or its attachments. This message and
> its attachments are intended only for use by the individual(s) listed as
> the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), or
> responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you are hereby
> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of
> any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify
> the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the email.
> Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
> relate to official company business shall be understood as neither given
> nor endorsed by the company.
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list