[NTLUG:Discuss] Internet Explorer?

MadHat madhat at unspecific.com
Thu May 17 11:12:09 CDT 2001


At 10:52 AM 5/17/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Lower Time Sequencing skewed---
>
> >>> Let's not get into the browser conversation. Netscape
> >>> is far far far superior.
>
> >> They both suck.
> >>
> >> This is the same argument as Linux Vs BSD Vs Windows or
> >> emacs Vs vi or Photoshop Vs Gimp or etc...  It is a
> >> religious war and not worth wasting bandwidth and time
> >> over.  Each person is entitled to their own opinions.
> >> If you wish to discuss this, please take it off list.
>
> > It may be a religious war when making purely emotional
> > statements, but I am interested in discussing factual
> > information regarding the capabilities of two competing (sort
> > of) software applications.  Maybe Shipman could persuade me
> > to start using Netscape by informing me of some
> > feature/capability that I am unaware of.  Let's not turn this
> > into 'playground fighting,' or a vehicle for personal
> > attacks.  Let's keep it pro.
>
>Forget that!  Flame ahead on!  I love this drivel.

I am the list admin and am asking that if you wish to discuss which is 
better (IE or Netscape), to take it off the list.

If you want a flame war, go to the news groups or another list.

The point is, there isn't a Linux port of IE.  This is a Linux list.  Why 
discuss which is better when one of the options isn't available on the OS 
the list is supposed to be about.


--
MadHat at unspecific.com




More information about the Discuss mailing list