[NTLUG:Discuss] [Discuss] age verification in systemd

[crem1111 at hushmail.com]

Is it April 1st already?

 

CRem

 

 

From: Discuss <discuss-bounces at dfwuug.org> On Behalf Of stuart yarus via Discuss
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2026 5:10 PM
To: Open Discussion List <discuss at dfwuug.org>; NTLUG Discussion List <discuss at ntlug.org>; dfwrpi at groups.io
Cc: stuart yarus <syarus at gmail.com>
Subject: [Discuss] age verification in systemd

 

Hi,

 

>From distrowatch dot com / weekly.php?issue=20260323#news:

 

"Last week we talked about age verification laws <https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20260316#qa> , what they are and the issues surrounding these surveillance efforts. This week a new age tracking feature was added to systemd <https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/40954> : "[This change] stores the user's birth date for age verification, as required by recent laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26-051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc. The xdg-desktop-portal project is adding an age verification portal <https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/pull/1922>  that needs a data source for the user's age. userdb already stores personal metadata (emailAddress, realName, location) so birthDate is a natural fit." The birthdate field can be set by the administrator only, but can be read by the user and the user's applications. "

"Update: Following strong feedback from the community, an attempt was made to revert the change <https://distrowatch.com/%3ca%20href=> . The attempted reversal of the change includes a comment: "Introducing birth date storage or age queries (even local-only) creates a new class of sensitive user data in the OS that didn't exist before. It risks normalizing permission-like checks inside the desktop session and could be extended to far more invasive controls in the future." The reversal was denied by project leader Pottering, who insists the tracking feature will remain. "

 

 

-- 

Stuart Yarus